The Politics of Species
  • Home
  • Themes
  • Authors
  • About The Book

Major victory in conservation battle against oil company

Virunga activists have reported threats, intimidation and unlawful detention.  © Brent Stirton / Reportage by Getty / WWF-CanonA major corporate social responsibility agency today has announced an examination of Soco International PLC for alleged violations of human rights and environmental protections related to the company’s operations in an African World Heritage Site.

The move was triggered by WWF’s complaint alleging that Soco has breached the most respected global corporate social responsibility standards in its pursuit of oil in Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). WWF’s case has exposed “material and substantiated issues meriting further examination,” a United Kingdom Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) agency said in its initial assessment published today.

In the complaint, WWF documented evidence of Soco’s alleged violations of the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises including intimidation, threats and unlawful detention of local activists, as well as withholding critical information about environmental and social risks from those likely to be impacted by the company’s activities.

TAKE ACTION NOW! TELL SOCO TO LEAVE VIRUNGA

“Today WWF’s concerns about Soco have been validated. This initial judgement is a victory for conservation and sends a strong warning to any company that thinks it can get away with disregarding international standards,” said Lasse Gustavsson, WWF International Executive Director of Conservation. “We urge governments and the investment community to join us in telling Soco to leave Virunga. If it fails to do so, the company risks permanently damaging its reputation and that of the industry it represents.”

The United Kingdom, Belgium and Germany have all objected to Soco’s operations in Virunga, and more than 600,000 WWF supporters have signed a petition against the company. Additionally, UNESCO has called for the cancelation of the company’s permit, and French oil giant Total has committed publicly that it will not enter the World Heritage Site.

WWF is the largest organization ever to mount a case against a company using the OECD guidelines complaint mechanism, which applies to enterprises operating in or from any of the 45 nations adhering to the agreement. As part of its mandate to promote responsible development abroad, OECD has developed this transparent process to hold multinational corporations accountable for meeting their obligations.

“This decision sets a precedent and opens up to the conservation community a new avenue for safeguarding the environment through OECD,” Gustavsson said. “Working with governments and responsible companies, we will be able to use this tool to counter the pressures that are mounting against some of the world’s most precious places.”

Virunga is Africa’s oldest national park and home to more varieties of rare plants and animals than any other protected area in the continent. Although 85 per cent of the park has been allocated as oil concessions, Soco is the only company moving forward with exploration.

“With responsible investment, Virunga can have a prosperous future that brings sustainable development to the area and protects the natural resources that nearby residents need,” said Gustavsson. “Oil puts the park in peril, therefore we are demanding that Soco withdraw immediately.”

SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST SOCO AND HELP SAVE THE PARK

Comments are closed.

About The Politics of Species

The assumption that humans are cognitively and morally superior to other animals is fundamental to social democracies and legal systems worldwide. It legitimises treating members of other animal species as inferior to humans. The last few decades have seen a growing awareness of this issue, as evidence continues to show that individuals of many other species have rich mental, emotional and social lives. Bringing together leading experts from a range of disciplines, this volume identifies the key barriers to a definition of moral respect that includes nonhuman animals.

To purchase The Politics of Species

To purchase The Politics of Species

To purchase The Politics of Species

To purchase The Politics of Species

Themes

  • The Road to Respectful Coexistence

  • Carnal Desires

  • An Animal Bill of Rights?

  • Turning a Whale into a Killer

  • Apeism and Racism

  • What is a Person?

U.S. Office

445 5th Avenue, 7th Floor

New York, New York 10016

Phone: +1-212-488-3000

U.K. Office

95 Regent Street

Cambridge CB2 1AW

Phone: +44-1223-653040

Subscribe to Arcus Emails
More Information

contact@arcusfoundation.org

Great Apes & Gibbons Program

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

The Politics of Species
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.